diff --git a/src/blog/2022-01-02-pig-dog-05.gmi b/src/blog/2022-01-02-pig-dog-05.gmi
index 48e94d8..126c7d3 100644
--- a/src/blog/2022-01-02-pig-dog-05.gmi
+++ b/src/blog/2022-01-02-pig-dog-05.gmi
@@ -93,10 +93,11 @@ company - salary in no way reflects the value added by labour - but the truth
 is simpler, and sadder.
 
 I joined early on, and got more share options than people who joined later. The
-price of the shares has been doubling or tripling every ear, as has the number
-of employees, but I get a greater share of the total than those who came later.
-It follows that my wins come at their expense - they work, hundreds of them, to
-increase the company's value, and I get a cut of that.
+price of the shares has been doubling or tripling every year, as has the number
+of employees, but I get a greater share of the total than those who came later,
+since I quite literally own a greater share of the company. It follows that my
+wins come at their expense - they work, hundreds of them, to increase the
+company's value, and I get a cut of that.
 
 Bleurgh.
 
@@ -110,9 +111,9 @@ further appreciation is taxed at disposal time through capital gains tax - at a
 much lower rate, sometimes as low as 10%.
 
 The Bytemark scheme was very carefully worded to exclude any possibility of
-paying income tax rates, and most of the provisions I disliked in it came from
-that choice - it was made to fit the mould of an Enterprise Management Incentive
-scheme, which would attract CGT instead of income tax.
+paying income tax rates, instead targeting special CGT treatment, and most of
+the provisions I disliked in it came from that choice - it was made to fit the
+mould of an Enterprise Management Incentive scheme.
 
 => https://www.gov.uk/tax-employee-share-schemes/enterprise-management-incentives-emis EMI