From e4686dae087b586a6801f5b0cbcb27f00c94c149 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Thomas Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 14:51:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Minor fixes to README.md --- README.md | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 9ca2141..7c6a554 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ When received by the destination ISP, it can use its private key to decrypt the encapsulated packet, and send that decrypted packet on to its final hop. -LIMITATIONS +Limitations ----------- You have to trust two ISPs. @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ ICMP tracerouting (this can be fixed, especially in IPv6 - see _ICMP_). -SELLING POINTS +Selling points -------------- Uptake can be low (but not zero) and significant benefits are still seen. Even if just two ISPs take up the scheme, one access and one hosting, everyone @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ almost all IPv4 deployments. Fortunately, IPv4 is legacy, and doesn't strictly require ICMP, in the same way IPv6 does. -WHY? +Why? ---- It's my position that anonymity is only necessary in the presence of oppression. In the absence of oppression, anonymity primarily facilitates crime and wrong- @@ -140,10 +140,13 @@ Are we in an oppressive society? Do oppressive societies exist? I believe the answer to both of those questions is yes. I wish it were otherwise. -AUTHOR +Author ------ -Name : Nick Thomas -Handle : lupine -Web : lupine.me.uk -SMTP : nick@lupine.me.uk -XMPP : nick@lupine.me.uk +Name : Nick Thomas + +Handle : lupine + +Web : lupine.me.uk + +SMTP / XMPP / etc : nick@lupine.me.uk +